The ad Meta Ad Library snapshot

Before Don Coover asks for your support, there’s a question that deserves an answer: should any American have to pay a union boss just to keep a job? The PRO Act would override state Right to Work protections and allow union contracts to require covered workers to pay union fees as a condition of employment -- even when those workers do not want to support the union. For a worker trying to provide for a family, that means money handed over because refusing could put a job at risk. Union officials should have to earn that support, not collect it under the threat of unemployment. The National Right to Work Act would take the opposite approach: end federally authorized compulsory union payments and protect workers’ freedom to decide for themselves whether a union deserves their money. The person earning the paycheck should make that decision. Neither a union boss nor a politician should make it for them. Where does Don Coover stand on these two bills? Anyone seeking to represent you in D.C. should give a clear answer about whether they support voluntary unionism or compulsory union payments. Learn where Don Coover stands on the PRO Act and the National Right to Work Act -- and what those positions mean for workers’ freedom. Before Don Coover asks for your support, there’s a question that deserves an answer: should any American have to pay a union boss just to keep a job? The PRO Act would override state Right to Work protections and allow union contracts to require cover

View the ad in Meta's Ad Library ↗ (Meta does not allow embedding)